炉石传说AV插件下载,ArenaValue怎么用

概要炉石传说AV插件,炉石传说,炉石传说AV插件可代替人脑？

ArenaValue插件下载《《《

Trump vs. the Arena Value Application

《报告：Arena Value Vs. Trump》

原文作者：Poetic Stanziel

中文翻译：deathmew

So after comparing Kripparrian's arena picks to the Arena Value application, I continue to be curious. Today we look at Trump and how his picks will compare to the popular application.

在我的上一篇《报告：Arena Value Vs. Kripparrian》之后，我的好奇心并没有减退。今天我们将目光投向Trump，看看他的选择跟最近大火的插件的选择有什么不同。

Unlike last time, I'm not going to make the mistake of using the words experiment or prove anywhere in this article. It upset more than a few people, and for good reason. The last article didn't prove anything conclusively about Arena Value. I might have my own suspicions, my own opinions, on the strength of the application, but that in no way constitutes proof that expert arena players make stronger card picks than the application. I have my suspicions, but suspicions aren't facts.

跟上次不同，这次我不会再犯诸如此类的错误了：使用“实验”和“证明”这样的字眼。这些错误打击了许多玩家的积极性，完全可以理解。上一篇报告没有“证明” 关于Arena Value任何结论性的东西。对于报告，我也许有我自己的怀疑以及观点，但它们无法构成证明“竞技场大师级玩家能比插件做出更优选择”的证据。我有我自己的疑虑，但它们不是客观事实。

At any rate, these comparisons feed my own curiosity. I'll draw my own conclusions. And you'll draw your own conclusions. We can argue our conclusions, and that's all good.

无论如何，这些对比满足了我的好奇心。我会给出我自己从中得出的结论。同样的，你也可以从中得出你的结论。我们可以辩论，我也欢迎你们来。

If anyone is gung-ho enough to actually run an experiment, to test a Kripparrian or Trump deck versus an Arena Value deck, then find someone who has a similar skillset to yours. One of you builds the expert's deck, the other builds the Arena Value deck. Then you each play against each other. Perhaps 20 matches. Record the results. Then switch off decks, and play another 20 matches. Record more results. What is the final tally? Did the Arena Value deck win more often than the expert's deck?

如果你们中间有谁真的那么热情，特别想实践一次实验，去测试Kripparrian或者Trump的牌组对抗一个Arena Value牌组，那么你还得找到一个打牌水平跟你相当的玩家。你们其中之一是竞技场大师的牌组，另一个是Arena Value的牌组。然后你们开始对战。差不多20场吧。记录下结果。之后牌组对调，再打20盘。记录结果。最后的结局会是怎样?插件会战胜人脑吗?

(Be sure to click the images for larger, more readable versions of the deck lists and choices. The bold minions are Trump's choices. The numbers are Arena Value's card ratings.)

(点开可以看大图。卡组的选择是由Trump做出的。数字则是插件给出的评价。)

Rogue (6-3)

盗贼(结局：6-3)

Trump chose differently than the Arena Value suggestion six times for this deck. That's significant decrease from Kripparrian, who averaged ten differences per deck. Where Trump mostly differed was Fan of Knives. Arena Value tends to value it quite high, whereas Trump doesn't.

Trump 跟插件冲突的选牌在这一牌组中出现了6次。同Kripparrian比较，冲突显著地减少了。Kripparrian的选择差不多每3次就有1次跟插件有冲突。Trump的选择最令人瞩目的就是当3张牌中出现了 刀扇 。插件给 刀扇 的评价颇高，然而Trump不以为然。

All said and done, after the picks, Trump predicted six wins for this deck. He didn't much like the curve (calling it an ascending hill), feeling his late game was probably a bit weak on minions. On the other hand, his spells and weapons might be able to get him out of any late game jams.

选牌之后，Trump预测这个牌组能打6胜。他不是很喜欢这个法力曲线(称其为“极陡的山坡”)，觉得大后期会缺少优质仆从。另一方面，他的法术和武器也许能使他避免进入大后期的漩涡。

At pick 7 he chose Assassinate over Defias Ringleader, because in Trump's words Defias is no longer the awesome card he once thought it was. On pick 12 he was seriously considering Blade Flurry over Abomination, because of the number of Deadly Poisons he had, but in the end fell back to the safe pick.

在第7选中，他选择了 刺杀 ，而不是 迪菲亚头目，对此Trump是这样说的： 迪菲亚头目 在他看来不再像以前他认为的那般强力了。在第12选中，他考虑了很久，关于 剑刃风暴 还是 憎恶，他更倾向于 剑刃风暴 ，因为他手头有好些个 毒药 ，但最后保守的风格导致他还是选择了 憎恶 。

ArenaValue插件下载《《《